CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 29. CONTINUANCE
Art. 29.01. [538] [603] [592] By operation of law
Criminal actions are continued by operation of law if:
(1) The individual defendant has not been arrested;
(2) A defendant corporation or association has not been served with
summons; or
(3) There is not sufficient time for trial at that term of court.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Amended by Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 970, ch. 399, Sec. 2(A), eff.
Jan. 1, 1974.
Art. 29.011. Religious holy day
(a) In this article:
(1) "Religious organization" means an organization that meets the
standards for qualifying as a religious organization under Section
11.20, Tax Code.
(2) "Religious holy day" means a day on which the tenets of a
religious organization prohibit its members from participating in
secular activities, such as court proceedings.
(b) If a defendant, an attorney representing the defendant, or an
attorney representing the state in a criminal action is required to
appear at a court proceeding on a religious holy day observed by the
person, the court shall continue the action.
(c) A defendant or attorney seeking a continuance must file with the
court an affidavit stating:
(1) the grounds for the continuance; and
(2) that the person holds religious beliefs that prohibit him from
taking part in a court proceeding on the day for which the
continuance is sought.
(d) An affidavit filed under Subsection (c) of this article is proof
of the facts stated and need not be corroborated.
Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 825, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987.
Subsecs. (b), (c) amended by Acts 1991, 72nd Leg., ch. 815, Sec. 1,
eff. Sept. 1, 1991.
For provisions relating to jurors, see art. 29.012, Religious holy
day
Art. 29.012. Religious holy day
(a) In this article:
(1) "Religious organization" means an organization that meets the
standards for qualification as a religious organization under
Section 11.20, Tax Code.
(2) "Religious holy day" means a day on which the tenets of a
religious organization prohibit its members from participating in
secular activities, such as court proceedings.
(b) If a juror in a criminal action is required to appear at a court
proceeding on a religious holy day observed by the juror, the court
or the court's designee shall recess the criminal action until the
next day the court is in session after the conclusion of the holy
day.
(c) A juror seeking a recess must file with the court before the
final selection of the jury an affidavit stating:
(1) the grounds for the recess; and
(2) that the juror holds religious beliefs that prohibit him from
taking part in a court proceeding on the day for which the recess is
sought.
(d) An affidavit filed under Subsection (c) of this section is proof
of the facts stated and need not be corroborated.
Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 589, Sec. 1, eff. Aug. 31, 1987; Acts
1987, 70th Leg., ch. 825, Sec. 4, eff. Sept. 1, 1987.
For provisions relating to parties, see art. 29.011, Religious holy
day
Art. 29.02. [539] [604] [593] By agreement
A criminal action may be continued by consent of the parties
thereto, in open court, at any time on a showing of good cause, but a
continuance may be only for as long as is necessary.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Amended by Acts 1977, 65th Leg., p. 1972, ch. 787, Sec. 3, eff. July
1, 1978.
Art. 29.03. [540] [605] [594] For sufficient cause shown
A criminal action may be continued on the written motion of the
State or of the defendant, upon sufficient cause shown; which cause
shall be fully set forth in the motion. A continuance may be only
for as long as is necessary.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Amended by Acts 1977, 65th Leg., p. 1972, ch. 787, Sec. 3, eff. July
1, 1978.
Art. 29.04. [541] [606] [595] First motion by state
It shall be sufficient, upon the first motion by the State for a
continuance, if the same be for the want of a witness, to state:
1. The name of the witness and his residence, if known, or that his
residence is unknown;
2. The diligence which has been used to procure his attendance; and
it shall not be considered sufficient diligence to have caused to be
issued, or to have applied for, a subpoena, in cases where the law
authorized an attachment to issue; and
3. That the testimony of the witness is believed by the applicant to
be material for the State.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Art. 29.05. [542] [607] [596] Subsequent motion by state
On any subsequent motion for a continuance by the State, for the
want of a witness, the motion, in addition to the requisites in the
preceding Article, must show:
1. The facts which the applicant expects to establish by the
witness, and it must appear to the court that they are material;
2. That the applicant expects to be able to procure the attendance
of the witness at the next term of the court; and
3. That the testimony cannot be procured from any other source
during the present term of the court.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Art. 29.06. [543][608][597] First motion by defendant
In the first motion by the defendant for a continuance, it shall be
necessary, if the same be on account of the absence of a witness, to
state:
1. The name of the witness and his residence, if known, or that his
residence is not known.
2. The diligence which has been used to procure his attendance; and
it shall not be considered sufficient diligence to have caused to be
issued, or to have applied for, a subpoena, in cases where the law
authorized an attachment to issue.
3. The facts which are expected to be proved by the witness, and it
must appear to the court that they are material.
4. That the witness is not absent by the procurement or consent of
the defendant.
5. That the motion is not made for delay.
6. That there is no reasonable expectation that attendance of the
witness can be secured during the present term of court by a
postponement of the trial to some future day of said term. The
truth of the first, or any subsequent motion, as well as the merit
of the ground set forth therein and its sufficiency shall be
addressed to the sound discretion of the court called to pass upon
the same, and shall not be granted as a matter of right. If a motion
for continuance be overruled, and the defendant convicted, if it
appear upon the trial that the evidence of the witness or witnesses
named in the motion was of a material character, and that the facts
set forth in said motion were probably true, a new trial should be
granted, and the cause continued or postponed to a future day of the
same term.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Art. 29.07. [544] [609] [598] Subsequent motion by defendant
Subsequent motions for continuance on the part of the defendant
shall, in addition to the requisites in the preceding Article,
state also:
1. That the testimony cannot be procured from any other source known
to the defendant; and
2. That the defendant has reasonable expectation of procuring the
same at the next term of the court.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Art. 29.08. [545] [610] [599] Motion sworn to
All motions for continuance must be sworn to by a person having
personal knowledge of the facts relied on for the continuance.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Amended by Acts 1981, 67th Leg., p. 504, ch. 210, Sec. 1, eff. Sept.
1, 1981.
Art. 29.09. [547] [612] [601] Controverting motion
Any material fact stated, affecting diligence, in a motion for a
continuance, may be denied in writing by the adverse party. The
denial shall be supported by the oath of some credible person, and
filed as soon as practicable after the filing of such motion.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Art. 29.10. [548] [613] [602] When denial is filed
When such denial is filed, the issue shall be tried by the judge;
and he shall hear testimony by affidavits, and grant or refuse
continuance, according to the law and facts of the case.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Art. 29.11. [549] [614] [603] Argument
No argument shall be heard on a motion for a continuance, unless
requested by the judge; and when argument is heard, the applicant
shall have the right to open and conclude it.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Art. 29.12. [550] [615] [604] Bail resulting from continuance
If a defendant in a capital case demand a trial, and it appears that
more than one continuance has been granted to the State, and that
the defendant has not before applied for a continuance, he shall be
entitled to be admitted to bail, unless it be made to appear to the
satisfaction of the court that a material witness of the State had
been prevented from attendance by the procurement of the defendant
or some person acting in his behalf.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
Art. 29.13. [551] [616] [605] Continuance after trial is begun
A continuance or postponement may be granted on the motion of the
State or defendant after the trial has begun, when it is made to
appear to the satisfaction of the court that by some unexpected
occurrence since the trial began, which no reasonable diligence
could have anticipated, the applicant is so taken by surprise that a
fair trial cannot be had.
Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1966.
